Dear Judge Smith

Sue B_Head SquareDear Judge Smith:

It has been over four months since June 26, 2013 when my husband had his Administrative Law Judge hearing with you in order to appeal Freedom Blue’s denial of coverage for his Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM).   My husband, his endocrinologist and I all testified regarding the necessity of him having a CGM to prevent a catastrophic episode of hypoglycemia that could cause him to lose his life because of extremely low blood sugar.  We presented you with numerous charts and exhibits so that you would understand how quickly his blood sugar can plunge from normal to low with the result that he can’t make the necessary corrections by himself.  In some cases, he has had to be revived by the EMS.

To date, we have heard nothing from your office.  We are anxiously awaiting the determination and thought that it would come in a timely manner due to the seriousness of the situation.  We were originally told that we would get the decision in four to Mailboxsix weeks.  After four months we are now well past that period of time.  I called your legal assistant and was told that we could not get any information until the decision was mailed.  All he could tell me was that it was “in queue.”  What does that mean?  Do we have to wait weeks, months or even longer to find out whether we got a favorable or an unfavorable decision?  In the meantime, each and every day of my husband’s life, I worry.  From the time he leaves the house for work until the moment he gets home at the end of the day, my mind is constantly wondering and praying that he’ll come home to me safely.  Our frustration is at an all time high.

There is something so wrong with the entire system.  There are many men and women in the same position as my husband who desperately need the CGM and sensors and can’t afford them.  There are many men and women who have gone through or are now going through the Medicare Appeal process who will have to wait for many months in order to get their decisions.  Does someone have to die before any of this changes?   I sincerely hope not.  In the meantime, we wait and wait and wait each day for the mail in hope that the decision will finally be here.

Very truly yours,

Sue from Pennsylvania

Hey, He Needs his Insulin!

Sue B_Head SquareWho would ever think that it can be difficult to get insulin for someone on Medicare?

For the past 15 months my husband Marc has been on Medicare. During most of that time we have been fighting for Medicare coverage of a CGM because he has hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia unawareness. We thought that the CGM would be the biggest obstacle that we would encounter in dealing with diabetes under Medicare. It turns out that while a CGM is an extremely important device for Marc, insulin has turned out to be an even bigger obstacle.

Under Medicare Marc previously got his insulin with no problems because it was being billed under Part D. As a result of the deductible on his supplemental insurance policy, he had a substantial co-pay for the insulin. Recently he found out that his insulin should be billed under Part B of Medicare because he uses an insulin pump. Insulin under Part B provides significant savings because there are no co-pays and the cost is excluded from the donut hole gap in coverage. The Part D billing was partially our mistake because we didn’t understand Part D, Part B or any other parts for that matter.

Now we come to these past few weeks when once again Marc needed insulin. We were told that CVS Pharmacy has a contract with Medicare for insulin.  Marc took his prescription over to CVS which is only 3 minutes from our home. The pharmacist told him that she would run it through to see what the charge would be under Part B. After three days, Marc received a call from CVS saying that his co-pay would be $1900 for a three month supply. We could get no answer as to why the charge was so much.  Can you imagine how quickly Marc sent me to the pharmacy to pick up the script?

Because he’s a working stiff and I’m a stay at home person (I can’t say mom because the kids are grown and out of the house), I was assigned the task of trying to get insulin. I first called CVS’s customer service line. The wait to speak to a customer service representative was approximately 30 minutes. When I got through and explained what the situation was in trying to get the prescription covered by them under Part B, she put me on hold for another 30 minutes while she tried to contact the CVS Running into brick walls_2pharmacy that we use. She was told that they couldn’t tell her anything because they didn’t have the insulin script in their possession and there was nothing in their computer system. So much for the waste of 1 hour. I did straighten up the house during the long wait so at least some good came out of the call. Thanks to the person who invented the cordless speaker phone.

My next call was to Medicare. Again, I had to hold on for about 10 minutes until someone came on the line. My question to Myra (we got to be good friends during this conversation) was whether a diabetic on an insulin pump would be covered 100% for insulin under Medicare Part B. She asked me to hold while she did her research and when she came back on the line, she told me “most definitely” the insulin would be covered and the cost would not go towards the donut hole. Glory be. Finally concrete information that confirmed what I had been previously told. Maybe Marc would finally be able to get his insulin.

I asked her if she could give me the name of Medicare Providers who dealt with Part B insulin and once more I was asked to hold. When Myra came back on the line, she said there were at least 20 providers for insulin and she proceeded to give me a list of the names and phone numbers. I thanked her profusely and after an hour on the phone with her, I hung up thinking that finally, finally we had hit pay dirt.

I called each and every one of the so-called providers of insulin on the Medicare list and not a single one of them provides insulin. One pharmacist told me that they don’t handle insulin for Medicare because Medicare doesn’t reimburse them enough money to make it worthwhile. Now, I ask, what is wrong with this picture?  How can Medicare not know who supplies insulin? More importantly, how can the reimbursement be so low that pharmacies won’t supply it for Medicare recipients? I was at my wits end after all these calls. Marc needed insulin and I didn’t know what to do next to get it.

Suddenly, a light bulb went off in my head and I decided to call Walgreens.  Somewhere I had heard that they supply insulin to Medicare recipients under Part B.  Mind you, I have no Walgreens in my area and the closest one is 45 minutes away. But at this point, I probably would have traveled two hours to get the insulin. The call was answered immediately by a pharmacist who confirmed that Walgreen’s is a Medicare Provider for insulin. I felt like jumping for joy. I was told what was needed to get an approval from Medicare:  things like my husband’s height and weight, (thought this was strange), pump manufacturer, serial number, date it was purchased and whether it was a private purchase or an insurance company purchase. We faxed the information Running in circles_2immediately and were told by the pharmacist that she didn’t see any problem in getting Medicare to approve the insulin, and we should be able to pick it up on Sunday. Three days later I received a call from the pharmacist informing me that they could not supply the insulin. She said that when he signed up for Medicare, my husband waived his right to certain things. She couldn’t explain what those things were.

Now we were back to square one. Once again I called Medicare. When I mentioned what Walgreen’s had told us about waiving rights, Fred (I was establishing quite a lot of first name relationships with Medicare reps) said there was no such thing.  You don’t waive any rights when you sign up for Medicare. He said I should call Freedom Blue, Marc’s supplemental insurance company. I’m thinking “here we go again.” This whole thing was becoming like the movie “Groundhog Day”.

Nevertheless, I called the insurance company and was told that the only approved supplier under our contract was Liberty Medical. I don’t understand why I wasn’t told this a week ago. Liberty Medical was one of the suppliers that we had originally called when we started this whole process and they gave us a quote of $1100 for the co-pay. Now I was placing another call to Liberty Medical and after holding for 20 minutes, the customer service rep looked up my husband’s records and said that they could foresee no problems with supplying the insulin. So with fingers crossed, I ordered the insulin and hoped that this time we would get it.

One day later, UPS knocked on our door with a boxful of insulin. I felt like I had won a huge battle but was continuing to holding my breath hoping that we wouldn’t get a bill for a co-pay. Last week we got notification that Freedom Blue has accepted the amount that Medicare paid for the insulin. What a thrill that after a harrowing week of spending more then 11 hours on the telephone (most of it on hold), the insulin is finally in our fridge and we don’t have to worry about a large co-pay.

Success_3As a non-diabetic spouse of someone with Type 1, I give thanks to those in the diabetes online community who have guided me in my daily journey to learn more about diabetes. Because of you I now know that insulin for an insulin pump is considered durable medical equipment under Medicare and is covered under Part B.  There is no co-pay and it doesn’t go towards the donut hole…which thankfully will be eliminated in 2014. I hope that this information will be helpful to anyone reading this blog who might not understand Part B.

My whole reason for writing this blog post is to say once again that “diabetes is a challenge in and of itself.  There shouldn’t be these issues that make a diabetic jump through hoops to get what he or she needs.”  I seem to use this quote in almost everything I write and everything I say.  Let’s face it…a person can live without many things. One of those things is not insulin.

There is something horribly wrong with the system.

Part 2: The Times They Are A-Changin’

Laddie_Head SquareThe first part of this series focused on change coming as a result of the Affordable Care Act.  This post will discuss one change that has already occurred in my healthcare universe and how I expect it to impact my care.

Late in 2012 I received a notice from my internal medicine clinic that they were switching to a cash-only model starting on April 15, 2013.  The primary reason for the change was stated:  “The present insurance environment reimburses independent clinics less than large, corporate practices.  To continue to provide the high quality care that you have come to expect at our office, we need to change our business model.”

Initially I panicked because I thought I was going to be forced to leave a doctor whom I like and respect.  Doing my homework I learned that my insurance will cover visits to this clinic, but it will be as an out-of-network benefit and I will have to file the claims myself.  The out-of-network provision means that any difference between the billed amount and the charges allowed by my insurance company will be my responsibility.

There are actually 3 options for continuing my relationship with this practice.  The first is a straight fee-for-service plan where office visits are billed based on time and lab/procedure fees are reasonable because they lack the high mark-ups traditionally billed to insurance companies.

The second option is a fee-for-service plan with a $300 annual fee for “Enhanced Primary Care.”  This plan provides access to my doctor through phone, email, texts and online care.

Cash Only DoctorThe third option is a Comprehensive Care plan where everything including office/hospital visits, labs, EKGs, phone consults and emails is covered for a fee of $2500.  This option is basically concierge medicine as shown on the TV show Royal Pains (USA Network) minus the mansions, sports cars, helicopters, and obnoxious brother.

After some thought, I decided that my initial panic was unfounded and that I should not make any changes for the foreseeable future.  One reason is that my current insurance through the high-risk pool in Minnesota will disappear in 2014 when insurance companies can no longer refuse me coverage because of Type 1 diabetes.  It seemed silly to find a new internist in 2013 and risk having to change again in 2014.

A second reason is that in recent years I have only seen my internist once a year for a physical.  Despite being the queen of autoimmune chronic conditions for which I see specialists, I’m pretty healthy otherwise.  I figure that if I have no significant changes in my health status, there is no major financial risk to staying with this practice.  As I choose insurance in the coming years, I will need to be sure that I have coverage for out-of-network physicians even if it is with a higher co-pay than in-network doctors.

A third reason is that I will be on Medicare in less than four years.  Although this clinic will be cash-only for regular insurance, it will continue to accept Medicare.  There is a caveat with this acceptance.  In order to stay in the practice with Medicare, you are required to pay the annual Enhanced Primary Care fee of $300.  I am okay with this fee and understand the necessity for it.  Medicare reimbursement is often ridiculously low or nonexistent for many services.  I realize that my doctors and their staff need to make a living wage in order for the practice to thrive.  Also the telephone consults and online benefits included in that fee will be beneficial.

I have an appointment for my annual physical in three weeks and this will be my first visit under the new cash-only model.  I have selected the fee-for-service option because currently I don’t need the benefits of the Enhanced Primary Care or Comprehensive Care models.

Although I was initially frightened by these changes, I am starting to be more comfortable with the idea of a different financial relationship with my internist.  In many ways I think that this change may end up ensuring that I have better medical care in the coming years.

Each of the five physicians in the practice has a personal statement on their website explaining his view of the transition to a fee-for-service model and his future in medicine.  My doctor ended his statement with the following words:

“The decision to no longer accept insurance is the change we needed to make. It was a very difficult one….  I hope that our sensible pricing system reflecting the service and follow-up provided will be understood as necessary to keep our practice viable. I believe that the new care opportunities for visits and consults, telephone and email, will result in better services and allow us to continue to provide the type of care our patients expect and deserve for many years to come.

 I always knew I wanted to be a doctor. I still do. With the patient as my primary focus. Practicing medicine the way it was meant to be practiced.”

Those of the words of a physician that I am pleased to call “my doctor” and I hope that his decision to take the insurance company out of the equation will be a good decision for both of us.

The Saints We Call Our Family

Sue May 2013_Head SquareThis blog is dedicated to all the saints who are our husbands, wives, children, parents, siblings, and any other family members who live with us diabetics and look out for our well-being day in and day out.

Sue from Pennsylvania is a contributing blogger here.  She has shared the work involved with trying to get her husband approved for a Dexcom CGM which he had been on for years until Medicare denied payment. She and her husband had a  telephone hearing with an administrative law judge while in their endo’s office. They are anxiously awaiting the judge’s decision. She lives in daily fear that her husband, who suffers from hypoglycemia unawareness, will have an accident or otherwise get hurt. Sue has been contacting her senators, representatives, other Type 1 diabetics, Diabetes Forecast editors, as well as federal judges. She is even planning on sending a letter to President Obama.   This advocacy has turned into a full time job for Sue; she is truly her husband’s earthly saint.

I am also an online friend of Mary who has both an adult son and daughter with Type 1 diabetes. Her son lives on his own, while her daughter who is mentally challenged requires almost constant supervision to control her diabetes.  Mary has been a longtime member of the DOC, and has gained and shared much wisdom in the fine art of managing the day-to-day details of her daughter’s diabetes.  Mary has been working on having her daughter live in an assisted living arrangement in her own home which she will share with two other mentally challenged women.  Mary’s children are truly blessed to have her as their mother.Inspiration_Clouds

My husband has had to live with the stress of keeping both my son and me safe.  My son has lived with Type 1 diabetes for 39 years, and I for 25 years. My husband has had to bring both of us out of comas when we went hypo during the night, as well as give us glucose during the day.

Last night while our son was visiting, he decided to return home.  When he went to get his stuff, I noticed that his blood glucose meter was on the table and I told him not to forget it. He just stood there, so I told him to check his blood sugar. He got a reading of 38 mg/dl. My husband immediately got him a can of soda to drink.

After he drank the soda my son took off and got in his truck. He got his keys out and tried to start the truck. My husband pried the keys out of his hand. My son got another key and tried to put it in the ignition. At that point my husband ordered him to sit in the passenger seat and then drove him home. I followed in our car. My husband and I were still shaking on the ride back home.

My son uses a Medtronic pump and CGM. His CGM read 128 while his meter read 38 and it never gave him a warning that his blood sugar was dropping. It is my hope that I can convince him to begin using a Dexcom CGM which I feel is more reliable.  My husband has been my and our son’s guardian angel all these years.

Who are the saints you call your family?

A Crusader for Medicare Coverage of CGM

Please welcome Sue from Pennsylvania who will be a regular contributor to my blog. Sue is the wife of a Type 1 diabetic and a crusader for the coverage of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems by Medicare.  I will be Medicare age in four years and Sue is fighting the battle to help her husband and everyone like me who follows in his footsteps.

*

Sue B_Head SquareThis is my very first blog post, so here goes.  I am the wife of a diabetic.  My husband has had Type 1 diabetes for over 15 years.  He’s been on an insulin pump for most of that time.  About five years ago, he got his first Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) and it made a tremendous difference in his life.  He has brittle diabetes, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia unawareness and before he got his CGM , would have episodes of very low blood sugar and in many instances, pass out because of this.  With his CGM, this no longer happened.

In June of 2012, he reached 65 and had to enroll in Medicare.  Since then, our life has been somewhat of a nightmare.  His CGM, at that time, was over 2 years old and starting to act up.  It no longer gave accurate readings and at times when he would go low or very high, it would no longer sound an alarm advising him to take immediate action.  When his endocrinologist wrote a prescription for a new CGM, his insurance company denied payment because unlike our private insurance, Medicare does not consider it a necessary device and in their words it is just a “precautionary” device. We have appealed the decision and had a hearing with an Administrative Law Judge on June 26, 2013 and are now waiting for the Judge’s decision.

For five years, my husband was able to lead a normal life without the constant worry of going into a state of confusion or comatose, especially when driving.  Now all that has changed and it’s put indescribable pressure on both of us emotionally and on him physically as well.  Having these peaks and valleys in blood sugars makes him tired and out of sorts most days.  Since he is gainfully employed and does quite a bit of driving in his job, it’s a constant source of worry that something awful will happen when he’s out on the road.

CGM CrusaderIt’s so hard to wrap our brains around the fact that something that is so lifesaving to my husband (and myself) is being denied by Medicare.  This is especially troubling in the face of the fact that our endocrinologist has gone to bat for us so many times during our quest to get a new CGM because she considers it of the utmost necessity for my husband.

Our hope is that our ALJ rules in our favor and that our insurance company upholds the Judge’s ruling.   After this happens, my mission in life is to have Medicare change their guideline for Continuous Glucose Monitors.

Strip Safely: Join the Campaign

Laddie_Head SquareLike many people with diabetes, I am frustrated by inaccurate readings from my blood glucose meters.  The FDA requires that 95% of our meter readings above 75 mg/dl be within +/- 20% of the actual blood glucose value.  Below 75 mg/dl 95% of the readings must be within +/- 15 points of the actual value.  That means that my meter reading of 200 could actually be 160 or 240 and be considered accurate.  Or my 60 could be a 45 or 75.  When you base your insulin doses on these numbers, it’s a scary proposition.

I have learned from the Strip Safely website that the FDA standards are only part of the problem.  Currently there is no further testing by the FDA once a meter and strips are on the market.  At the Diabetes Technology Society’s May conference, studies were presented showing that there are many BG systems on the market that do not meet current standards and that some are as much as 40% high or low.  That 200 meter reading can now be anything from 120-280.  Most of the non-compliant meters and strips are manufactured outside the USA and the FDA has trouble monitoring these companies.

It was suggested at this meeting that the CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) bidding process is creating an atmosphere where price alone is determining what will be available.  Quality is being sacrificed and patients are being put at risk.  If you want to see one of those patients at risk, look in the mirror.  I am close to Medicare age and I am terrified.  Because Medicare standards influence most insurance company decisions, everyone of any age is affected by this.

Bennet Dunlap of the YDMV blog is the driving force behind the Strip Safely campaign.   Only Bennet could have thought of such a titillating name:)  He is encouraging each of us to visit the website, take the quiz, and learn about the campaign.  Then we should follow through and write letters to our senators and representatives as well as members of the FDA.  There are instructions about how to do this on the website and many sample letters.  If you would like to listen to Bennet discussing the Strip Safely campaign, check out the 7/1/13 DSMA ‘Rents show.

Strip Safely_BANNERI spent the 4th of July writing letters to my senators, my representative, and the FDA.  I can’t think of a better way to have spent our national holiday than by exercising my right to influence my elected representatives.  The models for my letters were from the Strip Safely website along with Meri’s letter at Our Diabetic Life.  I wrote a longer letter to the FDA and if you would like a copy of it, please contact me through the link in my blog menu.  The one page letter to my elected reps is below.  This is the first time that I have ever written letters like this.  If I can do it, so can you!

My Sample Letter (please copy if you’d like):

I have had Type 1 diabetes since 1976.  I use an insulin pump to deliver the exogenous insulin that I cannot live without.  I test my blood sugar levels about ten times per day and this testing is a critical part of my diabetes care.  I need accurate meters and test strips to enable me to determine the correct amount of insulin required for meals, snacks, and corrections.  Inaccurate strips lead to inaccurate insulin dosages that can impact my short-term and long-term health with resulting blood glucose highs and lows.  Severe lows can be life-threatening.

The diabetes community in the United States needs your help.  Please help keep inaccurate meters out of the hands and off the fingers of people with diabetes.  At a recent meeting with the Diabetes Technology Society, the FDA acknowledged that there is a problem with test strips by certain manufacturers not delivering the level of accuracy for which they were approved.  Many of these manufacturers are from Asia and other offshore locations.  The FDA does not currently have a plan to do anything about the problem.

We need them to have one.  Please use your office to help keep Americans with diabetes safe.

Type 1 Diabetes is characterized by incredible variability and inaccurate strips make a difficult disease even more difficult to manage.  Please ask the FDA to implement a post-market program of ongoing random sampling of strips to insure that all brands consistently deliver the accuracy in the real world that they were approved to do.

We would also love to see the accuracy standard in the USA tightened to match the ISO standard of 15%.   But first things first.  Currently a lack of post-market quality control over manufacturers by the FDA degrades the existing standards to irrelevance.

The FDA has many responsibilities.  Please make Fixing Diabetes Testing Accuracy one of the things for which the FDA is known.

Very truly yours,